You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Histological and serological features of acute liver injury after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JHEP Reports, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100605 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Greta Codoni, Theresa Kirchner, Bastian Engel, Alejandra Maria Villamil, Cumali Efe, Albert Friedrich Stättermayer, Jan Philipp Weltzsch, Marcial Sebode, Christine Bernsmeier, Ana Lleo, Tom JG. Gevers, Limas Kupčinskas, Agustin Castiella, Jose Pinazo, Eleonora De Martin, Ingrid Bobis, Thomas Damgaard Sandahl, Federica Pedica, Federica Invernizzi, Paolo Del Poggio, Tony Bruns, Mirjam Kolev, Nasser Semmo, Fernando Bessone, Baptiste Giguet, Guido Poggi, Masayuki Ueno, Helena Jang, Gülsüm Özlem Elpek, Neşe Karadağ Soylu, Andreas Cerny, Heiner Wedemeyer, Diego Vergani, Giorgina Mieli-Vergani, M. Isabel Lucena, Raul J. Andrade, Yoh Zen, Richard Taubert, Benedetta Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 157 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 15 | 10% |
| Japan | 8 | 5% |
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| India | 4 | 3% |
| Turkey | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 101 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 145 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#428,528
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from JHEP Reports
#14
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,853
of 440,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JHEP Reports
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.