↓ Skip to main content

Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic Faecal Immunochemical Testing: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic Faecal Immunochemical Testing: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, October 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Gil, Helen Su, Kirandeep Kaur, Michael Barnett, Anna Murray, Stephen Duffy, Christian von Wagner, Robert S Kerrison

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 77%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,741,916
of 32,950,043 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,250
of 5,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,192
of 460,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#19
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,043 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.