↓ Skip to main content

Beyond facial width-to-height ratios: bizygomatic width is highly sexually dimorphic when adjusting for allometry

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
4 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Beyond facial width-to-height ratios: bizygomatic width is highly sexually dimorphic when adjusting for allometry
Published in
Biology Letters, October 2022
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0211
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2025.
All research outputs
#20,048,128
of 32,934,614 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#3,149
of 3,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,193
of 456,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#36
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,934,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.