↓ Skip to main content

Beliefs underlying UK parents' views towards MMR promotion interventions: A qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Health & Medicine, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Beliefs underlying UK parents' views towards MMR promotion interventions: A qualitative study
Published in
Psychology, Health & Medicine, March 2010
DOI 10.1080/13548501003623963
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study sought to extract underlying beliefs towards measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination from UK parents' views towards potential motivational and organisational interventions to boost MMR vaccination. Thematic analysis of transcripts of five focus groups identified five underlying psychological themes: parents' information needs, distrust of government sources, trust of other parents, attentional biases towards risk information and problems of achieving "balance" in MMR information provision. These are likely to represent important psychological barriers to or facilitators of the effectiveness of MMR promotion interventions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Ghana 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 22%
Psychology 17 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2012.
All research outputs
#6,093,442
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Health & Medicine
#207
of 1,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,548
of 146,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Health & Medicine
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.