↓ Skip to main content

Limited rigor in studies of raptor mortality and mitigation at wind power facilities

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Limited rigor in studies of raptor mortality and mitigation at wind power facilities
Published in
Biological Conservation, November 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109707
Authors

Tara J. Conkling, Christopher J.W. McClure, Sandra Cuadros, Scott R. Loss, Todd E. Katzner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 24%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 40%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Unspecified 1 4%
Energy 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,737,737
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#5,836
of 6,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,308
of 440,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#58
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.