You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nobody-fools-me perception: Influence of Age and Education on Overconfidence About Spotting Disinformation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journalism Practice, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2022.2135128 |
| Authors |
Maria-Pilar Martínez-Costa, Fernando López-Pan, Nataly Buslón, Ramón Salaverría |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 38 | 46% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Panama | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 71% |
| Scientists | 16 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 48% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#691,513
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Journalism Practice
#30
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,374
of 442,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism Practice
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.