You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patterns and driving mechanism of soil organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry across northern China’s desert-grassland transition zone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CATENA, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106695 |
| Authors |
Jiannan Lu, Shuang Feng, Shaokun Wang, Baolong Zhang, Zhiying Ning, Ruixiong Wang, Xueping Chen, Liangliang Yu, Hongsheng Zhao, Dengming Lan, Xueyong Zhao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,487,780
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from CATENA
#58
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,282
of 475,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CATENA
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.