↓ Skip to main content

Correlation between Male Social Status, Testosterone Levels, and Parasitism in a Dimorphic Polygynous Mammal

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Correlation between Male Social Status, Testosterone Levels, and Parasitism in a Dimorphic Polygynous Mammal
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012507
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Life history trade-offs have often been assumed to be the consequence of restrictions in the availability of critical resources such as energy and nutrients, which necessitate the differential allocation of resources to costly traits. Here, we examined endocrine (testosterone) and health (parasite burdens) parameters in territorial and non-territorial New Zealand fur seal males. We documented intra-sexual differences in sexual behaviours, testosterone levels, and parasitism that suggest a trade-off exists between reproductive success and physical health, particularly susceptibility to helminths and acanthocephalans, in males displaying different mating tactics (i.e., territorial and non-territorial tactics). Levels of testosterone were higher in territorial males and correlated positively with reproductive effort (i.e., intra- and inter-sexual interactions). However, these territorial males also exhibited high levels of parasitic infection, which may impair survival in the long-term. Our study, while limited in sample size, provides preliminary evidence for a link between male mating tactics, testosterone levels and parasite loads, and potential effects on reproductive success and life history that should be explored further.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Romania 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 55%
Environmental Science 10 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,805,461
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40,139
of 224,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,607
of 152,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#229
of 1,172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.