↓ Skip to main content

Ethics and science in natural resource agencies

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethics and science in natural resource agencies
Published in
BioScience, November 1996
DOI 10.2307/1312853
Authors

David J. Mattson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 11%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,746
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,879
of 29,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.