↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the Construct Validity of the Job Descriptive Index: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing the Construct Validity of the Job Descriptive Index: A Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, February 2002
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 340 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 15%
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Researcher 14 4%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 109 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 72 21%
Psychology 62 18%
Social Sciences 23 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 3%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 122 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,200,608
of 34,675,792 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#1,233
of 3,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,486
of 186,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#22
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,675,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.