You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
湛水下の水田土壌におけるリン酸の溶解度上昇の原因について
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.20710/dojo.76.2_199 |
| Authors |
飯村 康二 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 29% |
| Unknown | 22 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,032,409
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#1
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,265
of 74,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them