Targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE) has been increasingly used at the bedside in neonatal care to provide an enhanced understanding of physiology, affecting management in hemodynamically unstable patients. Traditional methods of bedside assessment, including blood pressure, heart rate monitoring, and capillary refill are unable to provide a complete picture of tissue perfusion and oxygenation. TNE allows for precision medicine, providing a tool for identifying pathophysiology and to continually reassess rapid changes in hemodynamics. A relationship with cardiology is integral both in training as well as quality assurance. It is imperative that congenital heart disease is ruled out when utilizing TNE for hemodynamic management, as pathophysiology varies substantially in the assessment and management of patients with congenital heart disease. Utilizing TNE for longitudinal hemodynamic assessment requires extensive training. As the field continues to grow, guidelines and protocols for training and indications are essential for ensuring optimal use and providing a platform for quality assurance.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,674,675
of 32,396,617 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#9,209
of 21,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,866
of 457,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#71
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,396,617 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
