↓ Skip to main content

Radiation of the Australian flora: what can comparisons of molecular phylogenies across multiple taxa tell us about the evolution of diversity in presentday communities?

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Radiation of the Australian flora: what can comparisons of molecular phylogenies across multiple taxa tell us about the evolution of diversity in presentday communities?
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2004
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Germany 4 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 347 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 93 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 22%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Student > Master 27 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 23 6%
Other 73 20%
Unknown 47 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 235 63%
Environmental Science 43 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 3%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 54 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2025.
All research outputs
#1,853,280
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,523
of 7,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,766
of 105,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.