↓ Skip to main content

Dissecting the Microscopic Steps of the Cyclophilin A Enzymatic Cycle on the Biological HIV-1 Capsid Substrate by NMR

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Biology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dissecting the Microscopic Steps of the Cyclophilin A Enzymatic Cycle on the Biological HIV-1 Capsid Substrate by NMR
Published in
Journal of Molecular Biology, August 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Peptidyl-prolyl isomerases (PPIases) are emerging as key regulators of many diverse biological processes. Elucidating the role of PPIase activity in vivo has been challenging because mutagenesis of active-site residues not only reduces the catalytic activity of these enzymes but also dramatically affects substrate binding. Employing the cyclophilin A PPIase together with its biologically relevant and natively folded substrate, the N-terminal domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid (CA(N)) protein, we demonstrate here how to dissect residue-specific contributions to PPIase catalysis versus substrate binding utilizing NMR spectroscopy. Surprisingly, a number of cyclophilin A active-site mutants previously assumed to be strongly diminished in activity toward biological substrates based only on a peptide assay catalyze the human immunodeficiency virus capsid with wild-type activity but with a change in the rate-limiting step of the enzymatic cycle. The results illustrate that a quantitative analysis of catalysis using the biological substrates is critical when interpreting the effects of PPIase mutations in biological assays.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 20%
Chemistry 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2010.
All research outputs
#3,863,076
of 28,839,374 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Biology
#1,037
of 12,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,068
of 117,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Biology
#5
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,839,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.