↓ Skip to main content

Conventional and Kampo Medicine Treatment for Mild-to-moderate COVID-19: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study by the Integrative Management in Japan for Epidemic Disease (IMJEDI Study-obse…

Overview of attention for article published in Internal Medicine, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 2,985)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
140 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conventional and Kampo Medicine Treatment for Mild-to-moderate COVID-19: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study by the Integrative Management in Japan for Epidemic Disease (IMJEDI Study-observation)
Published in
Internal Medicine, November 2022
DOI 10.2169/internalmedicine.0027-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shin Takayama, Tetsuhiro Yoshino, Sayaka Koizumi, Yasuhito Irie, Tomoko Suzuki, Susumu Fujii, Rie Katori, Mosaburo Kainuma, Seiichi Kobayashi, Tatsuya Nogami, Kenichi Yokota, Mayuko Yamazaki, Satoko Minakawa, Shigeki Chiba, Norio Suda, Yoshinobu Nakada, Tatsuya Ishige, Hirofumi Maehara, Yutaka Tanaka, Mahiko Nagase, Akihiko Kashio, Kazuhisa Komatsu, Makoto Nojiri, Osamu Shimooki, Kayo Nakamoto, Ryutaro Arita, Rie Ono, Natsumi Saito, Akiko Kikuchi, Minoru Ohsawa, Hajime Nakae, Tadamichi Mitsuma, Masaru Mimura, Tadashi Ishii, Kotaro Nochioka, Shih-Wei Chiu, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Takao Namiki, Akito Hisanaga, Kazuo Mitani, Takashi Ito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Researcher 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 23 77%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 24 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#398,039
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Internal Medicine
#25
of 2,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,057
of 442,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal Medicine
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.