↓ Skip to main content

A Study of TP53 RNA Splicing Illustrates Pitfalls of RNA-seq Methodology

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Study of TP53 RNA Splicing Illustrates Pitfalls of RNA-seq Methodology
Published in
Cancer Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-1624
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

TP53 undergoes multiple RNA-splicing events, resulting in at least nine mRNA transcripts encoding at least 12 functionally different protein isoforms. Antibodies specific to p53 protein isoforms have proven difficult to develop, thus researchers must rely on the transcript information to infer isoform abundance. In this study, we used deep RNA-seq, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) from nine human cell lines and RNA-seq data available for tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas to analyze TP53 splice variant expression. All three methods detected expression of the FL/40TP53α_T1 variant in most human tumors and cell lines. However, other less abundant variants were only detected with PCR-based methods. Using RNA-seq simulation analysis, we determined why RNA-seq is unable to detect less abundant TP53 transcripts and discuss the implications of these findings for the general interpretation of RNA-seq data. Cancer Res; 76(24); 1-9. ©2016 AACR.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Computer Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,238,372
of 28,829,220 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#776
of 21,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,886
of 423,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#24
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,829,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.