↓ Skip to main content

Spatially balanced sampling methods are always more precise than random ones for estimating the size of aggregated populations

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spatially balanced sampling methods are always more precise than random ones for estimating the size of aggregated populations
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2022
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.14015
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 27 51%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 21%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 33 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,529,400
of 34,811,371 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#878
of 3,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,266
of 469,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#12
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,811,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.