↓ Skip to main content

Stochasticity in evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
696 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stochasticity in evolution
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The debate over the role of stochasticity is central in evolutionary biology, often summarised by whether or not evolution is predictable or repeatable. Here we distinguish three types of stochasticity: stochasticity of mutation and variation, of individual life histories and of environmental change. We then explain when stochasticity matters in evolution, distinguishing four broad situations: stochasticity contributes to maladaptation or limits adaptation; it drives evolution on flat fitness landscapes (evolutionary freedom); it might promote jumps from one fitness peak to another (evolutionary revolutions); and it might shape the selection pressures themselves. We show that stochasticity, by directly steering evolution, has become an essential ingredient of evolutionary theory beyond the classical Wright-Fisher or neutralist-selectionist debates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 696 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 23 3%
Brazil 8 1%
Spain 5 <1%
France 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Other 25 4%
Unknown 613 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 168 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 157 23%
Student > Master 79 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 46 7%
Student > Bachelor 40 6%
Other 136 20%
Unknown 70 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 449 65%
Environmental Science 68 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 1%
Other 41 6%
Unknown 81 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,913,758
of 28,839,374 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,371
of 3,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,510
of 207,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,839,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.