↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimating formulas among Japanese adults without kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biochemistry, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimating formulas among Japanese adults without kidney disease
Published in
Clinical Biochemistry, November 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.10.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryosuke Fujii, Cristian Pattaro, Yoshiki Tsuboi, Yuya Ishihara, Roberto Melotti, Hiroya Yamada, Yoshitaka Ando, Hiroaki Ishikawa, Koji Ohashi, Shuji Hashimoto, Nobuyuki Hamajima, Giulia Barbieri, Dariush Ghasemi-Semeskandeh, Koji Suzuki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,155,228
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biochemistry
#178
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,452
of 440,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biochemistry
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.