↓ Skip to main content

The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 674)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. Duplex Scanning and Treatment of Superficial Truncal Reflux Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine and the International Union of Phlebology
Published in
Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, October 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.09.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Gloviczki, Peter F Lawrence, Suman M Wasan, Mark H Meissner, Jose Almeida, Kellie R Brown, Ruth L Bush, Michael Di Iorio, John Fish, Eri Fukaya, Monika L Gloviczki, Anil Hingorani, Arjun Jayaraj, Raghu Kolluri, M Hassan Murad, Andrea T Obi, Kathleen J Ozsvath, Michael J Singh, Satish Vayuvegula, Harold J Welch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Unspecified 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 34 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 36 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#181,108
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
#4
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,206
of 438,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.