You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecological and socioeconomic factors associated with the human burden of environmentally mediated pathogens: a global analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Planetary Health, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00248-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne H Sokolow, Nicole Nova, Isabel J Jones, Chelsea L Wood, Kevin D Lafferty, Andres Garchitorena, Skylar R Hopkins, Andrea J Lund, Andrew J MacDonald, Christopher LeBoa, Alison J Peel, Erin A Mordecai, Meghan E Howard, Julia C Buck, David Lopez-Carr, Michele Barry, Matthew H Bonds, Giulio A De Leo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 25% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 55% |
| Scientists | 30 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 37 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#770,164
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Planetary Health
#314
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,679
of 439,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Planetary Health
#17
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 147.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.