| Title |
Comparative meta-RNA-seq of the vaginal microbiota and differential expression by Lactobacillus iners in health and dysbiosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2049-2618-1-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean M Macklaim, Andrew D Fernandes, Julia M Di Bella, Jo-Anne Hammond, Gregor Reid, Gregory B Gloor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 378 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 81 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 66 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 63 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 46 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Unknown | 75 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,885,445
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#713
of 1,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,031
of 213,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them