| Title |
Electronic Health Records’ Limited Successes Suggest More Targeted Uses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Affairs, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1086 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Understanding whether electronic health records, as currently adopted, improve quality and efficiency has important implications for how best to employ the estimated $20 billion in health information technology incentives authorized by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. We examined electronic health record adoption in U.S. hospitals and the relationship to quality and efficiency. Across a large number of metrics examined, the relationships were modest at best and generally lacked statistical or clinical significance. However, the presence of clinical decision support was associated with small quality gains. Our findings suggest that to drive substantial gains in quality and efficiency, simply adopting electronic health records is likely to be insufficient. Instead, policies are needed that encourage the use of electronic health records in ways that will lead to improvements in care. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 66 | 28% |
| Unknown | 31 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 41 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 27 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |