You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural Antisense Long Noncoding RNA HHIP-AS1 Suppresses Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Progression by Increasing HHIP Stability via Interaction with CELF2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1615/critreveukaryotgeneexpr.2022043174 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan Yang, Yue Cheng, Yanfei Mou, Xianjun Tang, Xiaosong Mu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
#140
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,798
of 475,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.