↓ Skip to main content

Benefits and harms of treatments for chronic nonspecific low back pain without radiculopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Spine Journal, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 3,880)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
62 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits and harms of treatments for chronic nonspecific low back pain without radiculopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Spine Journal, November 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald J Feise, Stephanie Mathieson, Rodger S Kessler, Corey Witenko, Fabio Zaina, Benjamin T Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#698,980
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Spine Journal
#49
of 3,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,346
of 493,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine Journal
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.