↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Patients at Risk for 3-Day Postdischarge Readmissions, ED Visits, and Deaths

Overview of attention for article published in Medical care, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predicting Patients at Risk for 3-Day Postdischarge Readmissions, ED Visits, and Deaths
Published in
Medical care, November 2016
DOI 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000574
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transitional care interventions can be utilized to reduce post-hospital discharge adverse events (AEs). However, no methodology exists to effectively identify high-risk patients of any disease across multiple hospital sites and patient populations for short-term postdischarge AEs. To develop and validate a 3-day (72 h) AEs prediction model using electronic health records data available at the time of an indexed discharge. Retrospective cohort study of admissions between June 2012 and June 2014. All adult inpatient admissions (excluding in-hospital deaths) from a large multicenter hospital system. All-cause 3-day unplanned readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and deaths (REDD). The REDD model was developed using clinical, administrative, and socioeconomic data, with data preprocessing steps and stacked classification. Patients were divided randomly into training (66.7%), and testing (33.3%) cohorts to avoid overfitting. The derivation cohort comprised of 64,252 admissions, of which 2782 (4.3%) admissions resulted in 3-day AEs and 13,372 (20.8%) in 30-day AEs. The c-statistic (also known as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 3-day REDD model was 0.671 and 0.664 for the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. The c-statistic of 30-day REDD model was 0.713 and 0.711 for the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. The 3-day REDD model predicts high-risk patients with fair discriminative power. The discriminative power of the 30-day REDD model is also better than the previously reported models under similar settings. The 3-day REDD model has been implemented and is being used to identify patients at risk for AEs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Engineering 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2018.
All research outputs
#31,227,209
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Medical care
#4,760
of 4,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,577
of 337,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical care
#33
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.