↓ Skip to main content

Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2022
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2022.1837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Psychology 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,160,907
of 34,386,255 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,981
of 12,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,447
of 441,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#57
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,386,255 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.