↓ Skip to main content

The clinical toxicology of the designer “party pills” benzylpiperazine and trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Toxicology (15563650), April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The clinical toxicology of the designer “party pills” benzylpiperazine and trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine
Published in
Clinical Toxicology (15563650), April 2011
DOI 10.3109/15563650.2011.572076
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Benzylpiperazine (BZP) and trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) are synthetic phenylpiperazine analogues. BZP was investigated as a potential antidepressant in the early 1970s but was found unsuitable for this purpose. More recently, BZP and TFMPP have been used as substitutes for amfetamine-derived designer drugs. They were legally available in a number of countries, particularly in New Zealand, and were marketed as party pills, but are now more heavily regulated. This article will review the mechanisms of toxicity, toxicokinetics, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of poisoning due to BZP and TFMPP.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 11 12%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Chemistry 18 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 10%
Psychology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2025.
All research outputs
#6,001,748
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#795
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,705
of 146,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.