↓ Skip to main content

RNAi medicine for the brain: progresses and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Human Molecular Genetics, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
8 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RNAi medicine for the brain: progresses and challenges
Published in
Human Molecular Genetics, March 2011
DOI 10.1093/hmg/ddr137
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

RNAi interference (RNAi) is a powerful gene silencing technology that has immense potential for treating a vast array of human ailments, for which suppressing disease-associated genes may provide clinical benefit. Here, we review the development of RNAi as a therapeutic modality for neurodegenerative diseases affecting the central nervous system (CNS). We overview promising preclinical data for the application of RNAi in the CNS and discuss key challenges (e.g. delivery and specificity) that remain as these approaches transition to the clinic.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 100 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Researcher 21 19%
Other 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Neuroscience 9 8%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2025.
All research outputs
#4,312,933
of 32,683,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#1,551
of 9,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,377
of 152,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#10
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,683,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.