↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
video
3 YouTube creators
guideline
1 clinical guideline source
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
480 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, April 1998
DOI 10.1097/00005768-199804000-00014
Pubmed ID
Authors

ESCAMILLA RAFAEL F., FLEISIG GLENN S., ZHENG NIGEL, BARRENTINE STEVEN W., WILK KEVIN E., ANDREWS JAMES R.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 469 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 15%
Student > Master 56 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 11%
Researcher 37 8%
Student > Postgraduate 36 8%
Other 105 22%
Unknown 124 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 135 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 77 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 8%
Engineering 36 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 4%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 141 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2025.
All research outputs
#2,472,062
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#1,873
of 8,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,542
of 47,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.