↓ Skip to main content

Saturated linkage map construction in Rubus idaeususing genotyping by sequencing and genome-independent imputation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Saturated linkage map construction in Rubus idaeususing genotyping by sequencing and genome-independent imputation
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rapid development of highly saturated genetic maps aids molecular breeding, which can accelerate gain per breeding cycle in woody perennial plants such as Rubus idaeus (red raspberry). Recently, robust genotyping methods based on high-throughput sequencing were developed, which provide high marker density, but result in some genotype errors and a large number of missing genotype values. Imputation can reduce the number of missing values and can correct genotyping errors, but current methods of imputation require a reference genome and thus are not an option for most species.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Brazil 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 223 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 26%
Researcher 59 24%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 36 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 163 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Computer Science 3 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 42 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#10,278,641
of 34,296,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,125
of 12,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,885
of 348,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#60
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,296,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.