↓ Skip to main content

Management of congenital talipes equinovarus using the Ponseti method: a systematic review.

Overview of attention for article published in The Bone & Joint Journal, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Management of congenital talipes equinovarus using the Ponseti method: a systematic review.
Published in
The Bone & Joint Journal, September 2011
DOI 10.1302/0301-620x.93b9.26947
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 223 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 20%
Student > Postgraduate 27 12%
Student > Master 23 10%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 63 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 68 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#12,345,312
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from The Bone & Joint Journal
#2,683
of 5,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,130
of 173,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Bone & Joint Journal
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.