You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
表計算ソフトウェアによる微分方程式の数値計算
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1299/transjsme.22-00198 |
| Authors |
山根 清美, 湯浅 皓太, 伊藤 孝起, 小砂 匡, 竹村 幾史 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,317,436
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#72
of 552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,613
of 481,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.