↓ Skip to main content

Potential advantages and disadvantages of an endgame strategy: a ‘sinking lid’ on tobacco supply

Overview of attention for article published in Tobacco Control, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Potential advantages and disadvantages of an endgame strategy: a ‘sinking lid’ on tobacco supply
Published in
Tobacco Control, April 2013
DOI 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050791
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

One possible supply-side strategy for the tobacco endgame is a government-mandated 'sinking lid' on tobacco supply (tradeable but decreasing quotas on sales or imports).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Singapore 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Master 12 20%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#5,694,998
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Tobacco Control
#2,102
of 3,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,528
of 197,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tobacco Control
#30
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.