↓ Skip to main content

Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Human Factors, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,646)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
81 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
752 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis
Published in
Human Factors, June 2012
DOI 10.1177/0018720812448394
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 752 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 743 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 11%
Researcher 65 9%
Student > Bachelor 63 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 7%
Other 139 18%
Unknown 246 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 143 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 112 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 57 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 7%
Social Sciences 51 7%
Other 77 10%
Unknown 260 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#351,645
of 34,433,373 outputs
Outputs from Human Factors
#21
of 1,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,440
of 218,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Factors
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,433,373 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.