↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 3,580)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
90 X users
facebook
31 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators
guideline
1 clinical guideline source
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
739 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study
Published in
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.026
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of a specific nonoperative physical therapy program in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a multicenter prospective cohort study design.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 739 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 727 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 87 12%
Other 75 10%
Student > Bachelor 65 9%
Researcher 62 8%
Other 152 21%
Unknown 201 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 295 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 121 16%
Sports and Recreations 29 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Engineering 13 2%
Other 38 5%
Unknown 230 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2026.
All research outputs
#505,492
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
#18
of 3,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,852
of 245,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.