↓ Skip to main content

Waiting for elective surgery: effects on health-related quality of life

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Quality in Health Care, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Waiting for elective surgery: effects on health-related quality of life
Published in
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, February 1999
DOI 10.1093/intqhc/11.1.47
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Derrett, C Paul, JM Morris

Abstract

To describe the experiences of people required to wait for admission to a New Zealand regional hospital to receive elective surgery. Cross-sectional. Eligible people were invited to participate in a face-to-face interview with one of us in their own home or in a private office at the University of Otago. The study population comprised all people on the waiting list for prostatectomy or hip or knee joint replacement. Of those who were eligible and contacted, 89% of men (n=102) on the prostatectomy waiting list and 92%. of people (n = 47) on the hip/knee joint replacement waiting list were interviewed. Main outcome measures. Participants completed the SF-36 health survey to measure general health-related quality of life and condition-specific instruments to measure the severity of each participant's condition. Participants were also asked questions concerning acceptable waiting times. The majority of participants reported severe symptoms and significantly poorer health-related quality of life on most dimensions than a general sample of the New Zealand population. Neither general quality of life nor condition-specific health appeared to worsen with the duration of wait, but this may have been an effect of the study design. People with more severe symptoms desire surgery more quickly than people with less severe symptoms. The lengthy wait for surgery experienced by many participants represents a burden in terms of living with the unrelieved severe symptoms and poor health-related quality of life.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,751,715
of 29,994,169 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#201
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,525
of 117,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,994,169 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.