You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Taming wildlife disease: bridging the gap between science and management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12084 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maxwell B Joseph, Joseph R Mihaljevic, Ana Lisette Arellano, Jordan G Kueneman, Daniel L Preston, Paul C Cross, Pieter T J Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Mexico | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 4% |
France | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 229 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 56 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 14% |
Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 4% |
Other | 34 | 14% |
Unknown | 33 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 119 | 48% |
Environmental Science | 30 | 12% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 21 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 8% |
Unknown | 42 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,310,010
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,650
of 4,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,241
of 194,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#29
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.