Factors affecting optimal nutrition and hydration for people living in specialised dementia care units: A qualitative study of staff caregivers' perceptions
To explore the perceptions of staff caregivers regarding factors affecting optimal nutrition and hydration for individuals living in Specialised Dementia Care Units in New Zealand.
Qualitative descriptive study using a semi-structured interview approach with 11 staff caregivers at two Specialised Dementia Care Units. Data were analysed using a general inductive approach.
Two main themes were identified. The first theme 'It's about the individual' encompassed individual factors such as appetite, food appeal, and cognitive and functional abilities. The second theme 'It's about the environment' encompassed factors relating to the dining environment, the social aspects to dining and the provision of support with mealtime activities.
Factors affecting nutrition and hydration in people living with dementia are complex and inter-related. Organisations providing specialised dementia care, their staff and foodservice providers should focus on both the individual and environment to ensure optimal nutrition and hydration for the people in their care.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
3
2%
Other
10
8%
Unknown
44
34%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,494,216
of 27,696,488 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Journal on Ageing
#680
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,003
of 317,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Journal on Ageing
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,696,488 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
