↓ Skip to main content

Gastrointestinal and Hepatotoxicity Assessment of an Anticancer Extract from Muricid Molluscs

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Gastrointestinal and Hepatotoxicity Assessment of an Anticancer Extract from Muricid Molluscs
Published in
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), April 2013
DOI 10.1155/2013/837370
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Marine molluscs from the family Muricidae are under development as a potential medicinal food for the prevention of colon cancer and treatment of gynaecological cancers. Here we report the outcome of the first in vivo toxicity assessment on an anticancer extract from a muricid mollusc containing brominated indole derivatives. Mice received the concentrated lipophilic extract by daily oral gavage over a two-week period. Mortality or clinical toxicity symptoms resulting from the extract were not detected during the trial, and there was no difference in the body weight of treated and control mice at the end of the trial. Histological analysis revealed some evidence for mild, idiosyncratic effects on the gastrointestinal tract and liver, including necrosis, fatty change, and inflammation in a small proportion (<40%) of mice. This is likely to result from first-pass hepatic metabolism of tyrindoxyl sulphate combined with second-pass metabolism of indoles. Overall however, oral administration of muricid extract containing brominated indoles does not result in severe clinical toxicity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Malaysia 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#24,298,437
of 33,918,391 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#4,337
of 9,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,751
of 243,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#174
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,918,391 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.