↓ Skip to main content

An assessment of sleep disturbance in patients before and after total hip arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An assessment of sleep disturbance in patients before and after total hip arthroplasty
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, April 2003
DOI 10.1054/arth.2003.50056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jann M. Fielden, P.H. Gander, J.G. Horne, B.M.F. Lewer, R.M. Green, P.A. Devane

Abstract

Patients with osteoarthritis commonly complain of sleep disturbance that may be due to pain. Osteoarthritic hip pain is commonly alleviated by total hip arthroplasty (THA). Forty-eight patients waiting for THA completed a sleep questionnaire and were monitored using actigraphy and sleep diaries for 4 to 5 nights, 1 month before and 3 months after surgery. For the group as a whole, significant improvements were seen in subjective and objective measures of sleep after THA. In this study, 75% of participants reported that their sleep was never or rarely disturbed by hip pain after surgery. Actigraphy indicated significant reductions in time in bed and activity during sleep, more efficient sleep and less fragmented (restless) sleep. Differences between patients aged < 65 and > or = 65 years were observed. These findings support the hypothesis that relief from the pain of osteoarthritis as a result of THA improves sleep quality. Improvements in sleep contribute to the improved quality of life and day-to-day functioning seen after THA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Other 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 22 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Unspecified 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,405,938
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#1,113
of 5,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,219
of 70,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.