↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of pharmacist‐led fee‐for‐services medication review

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A systematic review and meta‐analysis of pharmacist‐led fee‐for‐services medication review
Published in
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2013
DOI 10.1111/bcp.12140
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim was to examine the impact of fee-for-service pharmacist-led medication review on patient outcomes and quantify this according to the type of review undertaken, e.g. adherence support and clinical medication review.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 315 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 93 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 96 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 1%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 103 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2026.
All research outputs
#3,439,506
of 34,299,408 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#923
of 6,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,331
of 375,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,299,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.