You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indigenous fire management and cross-scale fire-climate relationships in the Southwest United States from 1500 to 1900 CE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abq3221 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher I Roos, Christopher H Guiterman, Ellis Q Margolis, Thomas W Swetnam, Nicholas C Laluk, Kerry F Thompson, Chris Toya, Calvin A Farris, Peter Z Fulé, Jose M Iniguez, J Mark Kaib, Christopher D O'Connor, Lionel Whitehair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 34% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Thailand | 2 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 46 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 82% |
| Scientists | 13 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 250. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#149,138
of 25,542,788 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#1,324
of 12,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,035
of 484,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#66
of 563 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,542,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 563 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.