↓ Skip to main content

Reasons why Mycobacterium leprae cells do not multiply under the cell-free condition

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hansenbyō Gakkai zasshi Japanese journal of leprosy official organ of the Japanese Leprosy Association, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reasons why Mycobacterium leprae cells do not multiply under the cell-free condition
Published in
Nihon Hansenbyō Gakkai zasshi Japanese journal of leprosy official organ of the Japanese Leprosy Association, January 2001
DOI 10.5025/hansen.70.127
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Nakamura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hansenbyō Gakkai zasshi Japanese journal of leprosy official organ of the Japanese Leprosy Association
#39
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,202
of 115,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hansenbyō Gakkai zasshi Japanese journal of leprosy official organ of the Japanese Leprosy Association
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them