↓ Skip to main content

Causes, Responses, and Implications of Anthropogenic versus Natural Flow Intermittence in River Networks

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
42 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 7 9%
Lecturer 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 34 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 37 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,061,103
of 34,343,841 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#390
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,686
of 536,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,343,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 536,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.