↓ Skip to main content

疣贅状表皮発育異常症(Epidermodysplasia verruciformis,Lewandowsky-Lutz,1922)の疫学

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
疣贅状表皮発育異常症(Epidermodysplasia verruciformis,Lewandowsky-Lutz,1922)の疫学
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, August 2014
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.94.15
Authors

谷垣 武彦, 佐藤 健二, 佐野 栄春, 羽倉 明, 湯通堂 満寿男, 樋口 冨士夫, 池永 満生, 渡辺 信一郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#233
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,157
of 248,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#44
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.