You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of amyloid burden in individuals with Down syndrome versus autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Neurology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00408-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna H Boerwinkle, Brian A Gordon, Julie Wisch, Shaney Flores, Rachel L Henson, Omar H Butt, Nicole McKay, Charles D Chen, Tammie L S Benzinger, Anne M Fagan, Benjamin L Handen, Bradley T Christian, Elizabeth Head, Mark Mapstone, Michael S Rafii, Sid O'Bryant, Florence Lai, H Diana Rosas, Joseph H Lee, Wayne Silverman, Adam M Brickman, Jasmeer P Chhatwal, Carlos Cruchaga, Richard J Perrin, Chengjie Xiong, Jason Hassenstab, Eric McDade, Randall J Bateman, Beau M Ances, Alzheimer's Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome, Howard J Aizenstein, Howard F Andrews, Karen Bell, Rasmus M Birn, Peter Bulova, Amrita Cheema, Kewei Chen, Isabel Clare, Lorraine Clark, Ann D Cohen, John N Constantino, Eric W Doran, Eleanor Feingold, Tatiana M Foroud, Sigan L Hartley, Christy Hom, Lawrence Honig, Milos D Ikonomovic, Sterling C Johnson, Courtney Jordan, M Ilyas Kamboh, David Keator, William E Klunk, Julia K Kofler, William C Kreisl, Sharon J Krinsky- McHale, Patrick Lao, Charles Laymon, Ira T Lott, Victoria Lupson, Chester A Mathis, Davneet S Minhas, Neelesh Nadkarni, Deborah Pang, Melissa Petersen, Julie C Price, Margaret Pulsifer, Eric Reiman, Batool Rizvi, Marwan N Sabbagh, Nicole Schupf, Dana L Tudorascu, Rameshwari Tumuluru, Benjamin Tycko, Badri Varadarajan, Desiree A White, Michael A Yassa, Shahid Zaman, Fan Zhang, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Sarah Adams, Ricardo Allegri, Aki Araki, Nicolas Barthelemy, Jacob Bechara, Sarah Berman, Courtney Bodge, Susan Brandon, William Brooks, Jared Brosch, Jill Buck, Virginia Buckles, Kathleen Carter, Lisa Cash, Patricio C Mendez, Jasmin Chua, Helena Chui, Laura Courtney, Gregory Day, Chrismary DeLaCruz, Darcy Denner, Anna Diffenbacher, Aylin Dincer, Tamara Donahue, Jane Douglas, Duc Duong, Noelia Egido, Bianca Esposito, Marty Farlow, Becca Feldman, Colleen Fitzpatrick, Nick Fox, Erin Franklin, Nelly Joseph-Mathurin, Hisako Fujii, Samantha Gardener, Bernardino Ghetti, Alison Goate, Sarah Goldberg, Jill Goldman, Alyssa Gonzalez, Susanne Gräber-Sultan, Neill Graff-Radford, Morgan Graham, Julia Gray, Emily Gremminger, Miguel Grilo, Alex Groves, Christian Haass, Lisa Häslerc, Cortaiga Hellm, Elizabeth Herries, Laura Hoechst-Swisher, Anna Hofmann, David Holtzman, Russ Hornbeck, Yakushev Igor, Ryoko Ihara, Takeshi Ikeuchi, Snezana Ikonomovic, Kenji Ishii, Clifford Jack, Gina Jerome, Erik Johnson, Mathias Jucker, Celeste Karch, Stephan Käser, Kensaku Kasuga, Sarah Keefe, William Klunk, Robert Koeppe, Deb Koudelis, Elke Kuder-Buletta, Christoph Laske, Allan Levey, Johannes Levin, Yan Li, Oscar Lopez, Jacob Marsh, Ralph Martins, Neal S Mason, Colin Masters, Kwasi Mawuenyega, Austin McCullough, Arlene Mejia, Estrella Morenas-Rodriguez, John C Morris, James Mountz, Catherine Mummery, Akemi Nagamatsu, Katie Neimeyer, Yoshiki Niimi, James Noble, Joanne Norton, Brigitte Nuscher, Ulricke Obermüller, Antoinette O'Connor, Riddhi Patira, Lingyan Ping, Oliver Preische, Alan Renton, John Ringman, Stephen Salloway, Peter Schofield, Michio Senda, Nicholas T Seyfried, Kristine Shady, Hiroyuki Shimada, Wendy Sigurdson, Jennifer Smith, Lori Smith, Beth Snitz, Hamid Sohrabi, Sochenda Stephens, Kevin Taddei, Sarah Thompson, Jonathan Vöglein, Peter Wang, Qing Wang, Elise Weamer, Jinbin Xu, Xiong Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 52% |
| Scientists | 11 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 8 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 25% |
| Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 355. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#92,246
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#74
of 4,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,418
of 479,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#2
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.