Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without rapid on-site evaluation for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Endoscopic Ultrasound, November 2022

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 249)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 11 X users

guideline: 1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley: 16 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 15 X posts from 11 X users, with an upper bound of 27,683 followers.

@DharJahnvi @helpatologist @DrLakhtakia @teoh_anthony @GNTPak @docdhir @dredgodfrey @eusdoctor @abdullahaabbasi @DrHasan_Orlando @RichardJMorse @SahajRathi @NEndoscopy @neilRsharmaMD @SandyParkExeter @FUJIFILM_UK @CrinoStefano There is also our SRMA pub…

RT @DarylRamai: 📢Our latest study compared EUS-FNB w/wo ROSE for solid pancreatic lesions. ✅2147 patients ✅ Comparable sample adequacy & d…

@SyedGerdezi @BIDMChealth @DouglasAdlerMD @EHolzwanger @SunilAminMD @GKochharMD https://t.co/dbgVZS3gMg The reason I brought this up is that most academic centers have stopped using ROSE including @BIDMChealth With the newer needles, the benefit is min…

RT @AntonioFaccior6: https://t.co/2JaDsBP9fy Our meta-analysis demonstrates a non-superiority of EUS-FNB + ROSE over EUS-FNB with end-cutt…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 11 additional X posts.