↓ Skip to main content

Feline orofacial pain syndrome (FOPS): A retrospective study of 113 cases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Feline orofacial pain syndrome (FOPS): A retrospective study of 113 cases
Published in
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jfms.2010.03.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Feline orofacial pain syndrome (FOPS) is a pain disorder of cats with behavioural signs of oral discomfort and tongue mutilation. This report describes the findings from a case series of 113 cats including 100 Burmese. FOPS is suspected to be a neuropathic pain disorder and the predominance within the Burmese cat breed suggests an inherited disorder, possibly involving central and/or ganglion processing of sensory trigeminal information. The disease is characterised by an episodic, typically unilateral, discomfort with pain-free intervals. The discomfort is triggered, in many cases, by mouth movements. The disease is often recurrent and with time may become unremitting - 12% of cases in this series were euthanased as a consequence of the condition. Sensitisation of trigeminal nerve endings as a consequence of oral disease or tooth eruption appears to be an important factor in the aetiology - 63% of cases had a history of oral lesions and at least 16% experienced their first sign of discomfort during eruption of permanent teeth. External factors can also influence the disease as FOPS events could be directly linked to a situation causing anxiety in 20% of cats. FOPS can be resistant to traditional analgesics and in some cases successful management required anti-convulsants with an analgesic effect.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 41 21%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 51 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 72 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 48 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2025.
All research outputs
#4,144,137
of 32,686,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
#318
of 2,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,958
of 142,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,686,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.