↓ Skip to main content

正月の雑煮の食べ方に関する実態調査

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cookery Science of Japan, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
正月の雑煮の食べ方に関する実態調査
Published in
Journal of Cookery Science of Japan, August 2003
DOI 10.11402/cookeryscience1995.36.3_234
Authors

畑江 敬子, 飯島 久美子, 小西 史子, 綾部 園子, 村上 知子, 香西 みどり

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cookery Science of Japan
#136
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,779
of 53,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cookery Science of Japan
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.